SNEK POLICY
Body Cameras, Evidence and Independent Review
Public trust improves when important evidence exists, is preserved, and can be reviewed outside the chain of command involved in an incident.
Body-camera rules
Departments should use clear body-camera activation, retention, access, and disclosure rules, with documented exceptions for sensitive circumstances. Intentional disabling or destruction of required evidence should carry consequences.
Independent investigation
Serious use-of-force incidents, deaths in custody, and credible allegations of major misconduct should be eligible for independent investigation rather than automatic self-review by the same immediate chain of command.
Transparent outcomes
Final disciplinary findings and the basis for major decisions should be publicly available while protecting legitimate privacy, witness-safety, and due-process interests.
READ THE FULL POLICY
Why SNEK thinks this
Body cameras and preserved evidence can protect citizens from misconduct and protect officers from false accusations. The value disappears if agencies can selectively turn cameras off, lose footage, delay disclosure, or investigate their own most serious incidents without meaningful outside scrutiny.
How it would work
Officers performing public-facing enforcement duties should generally use body cameras, with clear rules for activation, privacy-sensitive situations, retention, and access. Relevant footage and other evidence should be preserved once an incident is under investigation or litigation is reasonably foreseeable. Serious uses of force, deaths in custody, and credible allegations of intentional misconduct should be eligible for review outside the immediate chain of command.
Where we’re flexible or still working it out
There are legitimate privacy concerns inside homes, hospitals, schools, and conversations with victims or witnesses. Not every accidental camera failure proves misconduct. Rules should distinguish technical mistakes from deliberate disabling or destruction of relevant evidence, with consequences that reflect the circumstances.
Related SNEK policies
A Right to an Attorney Has to Mean a Real Defense • Better Police. Higher Standards.